Re: Big problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: Big problem
Date
Msg-id 40B23D8D.2050501@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Big problem  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Big problem  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
>>Hmmm - I agree it's difficult, but somehow I think it's something we 
>>should do.  Just imagine if some major user of postgres did it - they'd 
>>be screaming blue murder...
> 
> Shrug.  Superusers can *always* shoot themselves in the foot in Postgres.
> Try "delete from pg_proc", for instance.  This sounds right up there
> with the notion of preventing a Unix superuser from doing "rm -rf /".

I have to agree.

FWIW, I've seen a unix superuser do a recursive chmod 777 on /, and I've 
seen a Windows server admin recursively deny EVERYTHING from EVERYBODY 
starting at c:\. In both cases, we found that's why we keep regular 
backups ;-)

Joe



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimizer bug??
Next
From: "Ismail Kizir"
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimizer bug??