Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> Would someone post the current regression.diff for Win32 against current
>> CVS? I would like to see what additional changes are required.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Summary and diff from my latest tests, with the extra line patch
> applied. I couldn't get the latest pg_regress.sh to work, so reverted
> to using the patch I posted earlier.
>
> I haven't had time to analyse this yet.
>
> Platform is W2K + current MINGW/MSys.
>
>
>
... and when I run it serially via make installcheck, I only get the
failure on the join test (rows out of order). It looks like maybe we
still have some timing/syncing issues to sort out.
cheers
andrew
