Re: Is there any method to keep table in memory at startup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vinay Jain
Subject Re: Is there any method to keep table in memory at startup
Date
Msg-id 4093349F.4050709@sarathi.ncst.ernet.in
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is there any method to keep table in memory at startup  (Andrew Hammond <ahammond@ca.afilias.info>)
Responses Re: Is there any method to keep table in memory at startup
List pgsql-hackers
Hi
thanx and sorry that I asked such a simple question in postgres-hackers 
list....
but the complexity which i feel on that basis ....please allow me to 
explain my problem further.....
As i am working on sorting order , length and substring functions for 
Hindi text(Indian Language)...
Here is the problem which i found in postgresql...
after setting collating sequence in proper way(i.e. C) the order was on 
basis of unicode values...but in Hindi Language some of combined unicode 
values makes a single character
similarly length is not appropriate for these reasons & hence substring 
operations
so i designed a customized data type called IndChar....and operations on it
in order by statement the only function called is indchar_lt(defined for 
< operator)......
Now please guide me where is starting(where i can open connection to 
database) and ending of my program....I feel only in indchar_lt function 
which will be called many times in order by statement causing 
performance degradation..as i am not much experienced this assumption 
may be wrong...
so my question remains as it is that is there any such thing which can 
be called at startup of psql.........to make connection to database

regards
Vinay




Andrew Hammond wrote:

> Vinay Jain wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>    thank you for such a useful information...
>>    but actually in my case if i keep table in disk it  significantly 
>> degrades performance and even for a table of  10 rows it takes 1-2 
>> minutes I think u r not beliving it ! am i right
>> for example
>> I create a table in which i use my customized data type say student
>> create table student
>> (Name INDCHAR //INDCHAR is customized data type
>>    age integer);
>> now i give query like this
>> select * from student order by name;
>> it will search for it's comparator operator (<) and related function...
>> in that function there is one lookup table if that table is in memory 
>> no problem! (oh but it can't be) if it is in disk  my program makes 
>> connection to database and execute query which is  just a select 
>> statement on a simple where condition of equality. then closes 
>> connection
>
>
> There's your problem. Creating database connections is an expensive 
> operation. They are not intended to be opened and closed often or 
> quickly. Open your database connection at the beginning of your 
> program, and close it at the end.
>
> You could also throw an index on the column you're using in your order 
> by clause, but that won't make a difference until your table get a 
> little bigger.
>
> Please take further questions of this nature to the pgsql-novice list.
>
>> so every time less than operator(<) is called it does the same task..
>> what i feel in table of 10 rows how many times the < operator will be 
>> called(NO idea but must be > 10 times)
>> is there any solution..
>> thanks in advance
>> regards
>> vinay
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Current CVS tip segfaulting
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Plan for feature freeze?