Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Well, if Win32 doesn't complete by June 1, do we still do the feature
> freeze? I don't want to be adding features after the freeze, that is
> for sure. When we have done that in the past, it has caused problems
> because some stuff gets in to make the system unstable, but other stuff
> gets left out.
It seams as though the win32 port is driving the release schedule, so
instead of picking June 1 out of the air, how about getting an estimated
time for completion from them, or more specifically a date by which they
should have all the major features done?
I know it's a chicken and egg problem, do we set a date for developers
to shoot for, or do shoot for specific features and choose a date from
there. I think there can no hard and fast rule on this, it depends on
the feature and the desire to put it in place.
Matthew
