Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 12:23:55PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>
>>I don't think we should rush at this. All of these solutions are based
>>on the existing structures. I have started thinking about a solution
>>that would involve keeping two versions of catalog names: a canonical
>>name and a "name as supplied at creation".
>>
>>
>
>Why do you want two names? Just keep the original casing, and a boolean
>saying if it's quoted or not.
>
>
Because I was not just considering the upper/lower issue - refer to the
thread that relates to unquoted names with case preserved.
cheers
andrew