Re: License question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Shachar Shemesh
Subject Re: License question
Date
Msg-id 4087C659.5060902@shemesh.biz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: License question  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: License question  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Re: License question  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: License question  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

>Shachar Shemesh <psql@shemesh.biz> writes:
>  
>
>>In particular, the front page claims that PostgreSQL is under the BSD 
>>license. The problem is that there are two.
>>    
>>
>
>We use the one shown in the COPYRIGHT file in the top directory of the
>source tree, which is also available for your reading pleasure by
>clicking on the "license" link on that same front page.
>
>            regards, tom lane
>  
>
Ok, let me explain the issue in a finer point.

The license given in the web link you mention seems to mandate all 
related work to be under the same license, which is nowhere near what 
BSD means. In particular, this puts some doubt on whether I can use the 
code in an LGPL project.

Can anyone shed more light on this point for me? Am I misreading 
something? If it is possible to put code into an LGPL project, what is 
the requirement?

-- 
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ssinger@navtechinc.com
Date:
Subject: Re: [Pgreplication-general] converting the DBMirror as peer-to-peer
Next
From: Shachar Shemesh
Date:
Subject: Re: valgrind errors