Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date
Msg-id 40870452.8070509@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> 
> The thing is, for how many ppl are seperate packages difficult?  I know
> for me, under FreeBSD, I cd to a /usr/ports/databases/pg_autovacuum and
> type 'make install' and its done ... I thought that stuff like Redhat had
> the full screen installer that lists things?

Well, if setup correctly for redhat, debian or even SuSE you would type:

apt-get install pg_autovacuum

or with redhat you might also do

yum install pg_autovacuum

But that is packaging and that is up to the developers of the particular 
project.

Joshua D. Drake




> 
> My point is that all of this stuff shouldn't be in the core CVS ... its a
> packaging issue, not a cvs one ...
> 
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions