Re: Fault Tolerant Postgresql (two machines, two postmasters, one disk array) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John D. Burger
Subject Re: Fault Tolerant Postgresql (two machines, two postmasters, one disk array)
Date
Msg-id 4086832D-67A6-47A2-9F82-497D4A28E47D@mitre.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fault Tolerant Postgresql (two machines, two postmasters, one disk array)  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
Responses Re: Fault Tolerant Postgresql (two machines, two postmasters, one disk array)
List pgsql-general
Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> Now, if B mounts the disk and starts
> the postmaster, but doesn't have a way to make _sure_ tha A is
> completely disconnected from the disk, then it's entirely possible A
> will flush buffers out to the still-mounted data area.  Poof!
> Instant data corruption.

Shoot The Other Node In The Head:

http://www.linux-ha.org/STONITH

- John D. Burger
   MITRE


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Hannes Dorbath
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory settings, vm.overcommit, how to get it really safe?
Next
From: ABHANG RANE
Date:
Subject: Re: cube operations