MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Nick Barr
Subject MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks
Date
Msg-id 4086316B.4050304@chuckie.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks  (Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>)
Re: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks  (Paul Thomas <paul@tmsl.demon.co.uk>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi,

Has anyone had a look at:

http://people.ac.upc.es/zgomez/

I realize that MySQL & PG cannot really be compared (especially when you
consider the issues that MySQL has with things like data integrity) but
still surely PG would perform better than the stats show (i.e. #7 31.28
seconds versus 42 minutes!!!).

On a side note it certainly looks like linux kernel 2.6 is quite a bit
faster in comparision to 2.4.

Nick




pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Nick Barr
Date:
Subject: Re: slow seqscan
Next
From: Edoardo Ceccarelli
Date:
Subject: Re: slow seqscan