Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Date
Msg-id 407d949e1002280602hb487003x26ee4756404c367@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables  (Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Gokulakannan Somasundaram
<gokul007@gmail.com> wrote:
> So just with a addition of 8 bytes per tuple, we can have the snapshot
> stored with the index. Can someone please comment on this?

The transaction information on tuples take 18 bytes plus several info
bits. It's possible just storing a subset of that would be useful but
it's unclear. And I think it would complicate the code if it had to
sometimes fetch the heap tuple to get the rest and sometimes doesn't.

I think you have to take up a simpler project as a first project. This
is a major overhaul of transaction information and it depends on
understanding how a lot of different areas work -- all of which are
very complex tricky areas to understand.


-- 
greg


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoiding bad prepared-statement plans.