Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: So do we really *need* those substring() ops in tab-completion queries? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: So do we really *need* those substring() ops in tab-completion queries?
Date
Msg-id 407d949e1001021906jfe6c888ie6212939706fd745@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to So do we really *need* those substring() ops in tab-completion queries?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: So do we really *need* those substring() ops in tab-completion queries?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>  If the conditions
> were phrased in a way that made them indexable, they might be worth the
> trouble --- but they aren't.

Wow, that is weird, especially since it's *easier* to write them
properly using LIKE anyways.

--
greg

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: invalid UTF-8 via pl/perl
Next
From: Hitoshi Harada
Date:
Subject: Re: IntArray in c.h