Re: clang's static checker report. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: clang's static checker report.
Date
Msg-id 407d949e0908231016v4ea77b97g6e2acfa7f0479423@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: clang's static checker report.  (Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj@pointblue.com.pl>)
Responses Re: clang's static checker report.  (Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj@pointblue.com.pl>)
Re: clang's static checker report.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz<gj@pointblue.com.pl> wrote:
> http://zlew.org/postgresql_static_check/scan-build-2009-08-23-5/report-MAVb5D.html#EndPath
> for a very positive one - at least from strict language point of view.
>
> consider: float f = 100000000; f++; printf("%f\n", f);

I believe the maximum value of the numbers involved here is the sample
size which is currently capped at 10,000. But I'm not exactly sure.

-- 
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
Date:
Subject: Re: clang's static checker report.
Next
From: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
Date:
Subject: Re: clang's static checker report.