Re: date_part()/EXTRACT(second) behaviour with time data type - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: date_part()/EXTRACT(second) behaviour with time data type
Date
Msg-id 407d949e0907291007p6817d4e1u91b964fe7a16ec2a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: date_part()/EXTRACT(second) behaviour with time data type  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: date_part()/EXTRACT(second) behaviour with time data type
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I agree that we should change it, but should we back-patch it, and if so
> how far?
>

Well at least to 8.4 so someone who has just always been using
downloaded binaries or binaries compiled with the default
configuration continues to get the same behaviour.

My inclination would be to backpatch it further back. But I'm not 100%
sure either.

-- 
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: system timezone regression failure
Next
From: decibel
Date:
Subject: Re: Higher TOAST compression.