Re: pg_dump additional options for performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
Date
Msg-id 4075.1202751988@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump additional options for performance  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> --pre-schema-file = foo
>> --data-file = bar
>> --post-schema-file = baz

> this looks good. But arguably it's really pre-data and post-data. 
> pre-schema would be something that comes before the schema, no? Or maybe 
> it should be {pre,post}-data-schema-file.

I was thinking that the names were a bit long, but I'm not sure we can
get away with omitting "-file".  --pre-file, --data-file, --post-file
are nice and short, but perhaps fail to convey the meaning?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
Next
From: "Christopher Browne"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump additional options for performance