Re: [pgsql-advocacy] SQL Spec Compliance Questions - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
Date
Msg-id 406D9943.8070401@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to SQL Spec Compliance Questions  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] SQL Spec Compliance Questions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
Josh Berkus wrote:
>>4.16.2 Referenceable tables, subtables, and supertables
>>        A table BT whose row type is derived from a structured type ST is
>>        called a typed table. Only a base table or a view can be a typed
>>        table. A typed table has columns corresponding, in name and
>>        declared type, to every attribute of ST and one other column REFC
>>        that is the self-referencing column of BT; let REFCN be the
>>
>>I really don't quite understand this, but I don't think we have it ;-)
> Was the SQL99 Committee smoking crack, or what?    What the heck is that
> *for*?

After re-reading it, I think it is related to (or at least similar to)
the work Tom is currently doing to allow composite types as table
attributes.

Joe

pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] SQL Spec Compliance Questions