Re: Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Diogo Biazus
Subject Re: Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed
Date
Msg-id 406AF751.7060502@ikono.com.br
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed  (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>)
Responses Re: Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed
List pgsql-general
Bill Moran wrote:

> Diogo Biazus wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I have a database using tsearch2 to index 300 000 documents.
>> I've already have optimized the queries, and the database is vacuumed
>> on a daily basis.
>> The stat function tells me that my index has aprox. 460 000 unique
>> words (I'm using stemmer and a nice stopword list).
>> The problem is performance, some queries take more than 10 seconds to
>> execute, and I'm not sure if my bottleneck is memory or io.
>> The server is a Athlon XP 2000, HD ATA133, 1.5 GB RAM running
>> postgresql 7.4.3 over freebsd 5.0 with lots of shared buffers and
>> sort_mem...
>>
>> Does anyone has an idea of a more cost eficient solution?
>> How to get a better performance without having to invest some
>> astronomicaly high amount of money?
>
>
> This isn't hardware related, but FreeBSD 5 is not a particularly
> impressive
> performer.  Especially 5.0 ... 5.2.1 would be better, but if you're
> shooting
> for performance, 4.9 will probably outperform both of them at this
> stage of
> the game.
>
> Something to consider if the query tuning that others are helping with
> doesn't
> solve the problem.  Follow through with that _first_ though.
>
> However, if you insist on running 5, make sure your kernel is compiled
> without
> WITNESS ... it speeds things up noticably.

Thanks for the advice, I'll try recompiling the kernel. Does the freebsd
version make a noticeable diference?

Regards,

--
Diogo Biazus
diogo@ikono.com.br
http://www.ikono.com.br


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Diogo Biazus
Date:
Subject: Re: Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Documentation clairification?, CHECK constraints