Nikhil Benesch <nikhil.benesch@gmail.com> writes:
> I took a look at 0002 because I attempted a similar but more surgical
> fix in [0].
> I spotted a few opportunities for further reducing state tracked by
> `ArrayCount`.
Wow, thanks for looking! I've not run these suggestions to ground
(and won't have time for a few days), but they sound very good.
regards, tom lane