Re: pg_autovacuum next steps - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: pg_autovacuum next steps
Date
Msg-id 405E420D.8070304@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_autovacuum next steps  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: pg_autovacuum next steps  ("Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I think these configuration issues will become a lot easier if you make 
> the autovacuum daemon a subprocess of the postmaster (like, say, the 
> checkpoint process).  Then you have access to a host of methods for 
> storing state, handling configuration, etc.

Yeah - why delay making it a backend process? :)

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum next steps
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.4.2 Build broken on (Sparc) Solaris 7 and 8