Tom Lane wrote:
> Although this is quite reasonable for queries submitted by
> user-written C functions, I'm worried that plpgsql programmers will
> be confused because they've never heard of SPI. I toyed with saying
> "SQL query" instead, but that seems pretty nearly content-free ... it
> doesn't distinguish these queries from ones submitted directly by the
> client. Can anyone think of a better wording?
"Embedded query"?
> Does this bother people enough to justify hacking the SPI interface
> to allow a label to be passed in?
That may be the only way to have the message make sense in all contexts.
Joe
