Re: tinyint and type problems - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: tinyint and type problems
Date
Msg-id 40573858.6080707@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: tinyint and type problems  (Shachar Shemesh <psql@shemesh.biz>)
Responses Re: tinyint and type problems  (Shachar Shemesh <psql@shemesh.biz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> I'll stress again - I don't mind doing all the work associated with any 
> once of the above choices. All I'm asking is that we agree on which one 
> will be best for this project. As far as I'm concerned, Choice 2 
> involves the least amount of work, but I think Choice 1 will serve 
> everyone better.

Sorry for jumping into this thread so late, but if you don't really need  arithmetic operators, index support, and
caststo all other numeric 
 
types, why not use "char"?

Joe


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Some one deleted pg_database entry how to fix it?
Next
From: Manuel Sugawara
Date:
Subject: Spanish list hosting request