Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I am not opposed to including a small logrotator for stderr logging.
>> I just think it is redundant when a good highly configurable logging
>> facility already exists. But, if Red Hat wants to pay Tom to do
>> it... :-)
>
>
> Maybe it is a question of preference or what is more convenient
> depends on the specific circunstances of the installation. I would
> prefer to give the option to the users, if possible.
>
This strikes me as the crux of the matter. Using syslog in certain
configurations may well be the best solution, but *we* should not be
enforcing that choice, IMNSHO.
cheers
andrew
