Tom Lane wrote:
>Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> writes:
>
>
>>Are you suggesting the that postgres project develop their own logger
>>rather than people just using one that has already been developed
>>by some other group?
>>
>>
>
>The problem from the point of view of Red Hat is to not introduce a
>dependency from the Postgres RPM to the Apache RPM ... this is no
>problem for people who don't mind hand-customizing their setup, but
>it is a problem if you want it to be part of the out-of-the-box setup.
>
>
Did anything ever come from this thread?
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-05/msg00603.php
(Heading: "Plan B for log rotation support: borrow Apache code")
cheers
andrew