Re: Replication - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Replication
Date
Msg-id 4034FC21.7070601@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Replication  (Andrew Rawnsley <ronz@ravensfield.com>)
List pgsql-general
>
> Mammoth is something you would have to ask Joshua Drake about. Don't
> know anything about it.

Just FYI: There is very detailed information about Mammoth Replicator
located here:


http://www.commandprompt.com/entry.lxp?lxpe=304


Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



>
>>
>> Is pgReplication ready for 7.4 yet? And are there any other *free*
>> options? If not maybe I'll have to find the money for a commercial
>> solution.
>
>
> Doesn't look like based on the web site at gborg.
>
>>
>> I'd appreciate any feedback from anyone who has a working replication
>> solution.
>>
>
> So far eRServer is working ok for me. If you use the unpatched version
> on gborg, be sure to
> read the erserver list archives, as the current tarball has a problem or
> two. If you want to
> work with my fork let me know. I like to think it works better, but I'm
> hardly unbiased...
>
>> Thanks
>>
>> John Sidney-Woollett
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if
>> your
>>       joining column's datatypes do not match
>>
> --------------------
>
> Andrew Rawnsley
> President
> The Ravensfield Digital Resource Group, Ltd.
> (740) 587-0114
> www.ravensfield.com
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Pavel aka crazy
Date:
Subject: postgresql & unicode
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Best replication options