On Mar 5, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> I'm not in favour.
>>
>> If the user has a preferred order, they can specify it. If there is no
>> preferred order, how will we maintain that order?
>>
>> What are the rules for maintaining this arbitrary order?
>
> Probably what Robert, Yeb and I think is to leave the current
> sync standby in sync mode until either its connection is closed
> or higher priority standby connects. No complicated rule is
> required.
>
> To do that, how about tracking which standby is currently in
> sync mode? Each walsender checks whether its priority is
> higher than that of current sync one, and if yes, it takes over.
That is precisely what I would expect to happen, and IMHO quite useful.
...Robert
