Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> As an implementation issue, I wonder why these things are hacking
>> permanent on-disk data structures anyway, when what is wanted is only a
>> temporary suspension of triggers/rules within a single backend. Some
>> kind of superuser-only SET variable might be a better idea. It'd not be
>> hard to implement, and it'd be much safer to use since failures wouldn't
>> leave you with bogus catalog contents.
>
> I believe oracle and mssql have ALTER TABLE/DISABLE TRIGGER style
> statements...
Oracle does for sure, but I can tell you that I have seen people bitten
by triggers inadvertantly left disabled before...I think Tom has a good
point.
Joe
