Re: Before ship 7.4.2 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gaetano Mendola
Subject Re: Before ship 7.4.2
Date
Msg-id 401FF461.4060003@bigfoot.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Before ship 7.4.2  (Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Lamar Owen wrote:

| On Monday 02 February 2004 10:54 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
|
|>Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com> writes:
|>
|>>Is someone taking care about the fact that the pgdb.py shipped with
|>>7.4.1 is the wrong version?
|
|
|>There is no pgdb.py in the core PG 7.4.* releases.  I suppose you
|>are talking about a packaging error in the RPM distribution.  Lamar Owen
|>would be the man to talk to about that ... Lamar, any thoughts about
|>this?
|
|
| Well, my first instinct is to throw out the python client RPM
entirely.  Then
| package the python client in a separate RPM.  My original plan was not to
| ship a python subpackage at all, but then I had a spec file change
| contributed that kept the python client in.  So I went that direction;
| principle of least surprise and all.  But I am not at all attached to
keeping
| it; likewise, the JDBC stuff could easily be moved to a completely
separate
| RPM instead of a subpackage.


Is it not too late drop the python client RPM for the version 7.4 ?
Anyway the version pgdb.py in rpm with the version 7.3.2 is the good
one, I don't know where you get the wrong pgdb.py pre 7.3.2, isn't this
file in any CVS ?





Regards
Gaetano Mendola




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAH/Rh7UpzwH2SGd4RAkD9AKCg8dwii1r0xKXZxa8H3UZ2oVPY/QCfThtO
yFyk9wzD3uVFzkRF7GJiDJU=
=HQnJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rens Admiraal
Date:
Subject: BLOB problem
Next
From: Gregory Wood
Date:
Subject: Re: Are there commands to enquire about table structure?