Re: Another optimizer question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dennis Haney
Subject Re: Another optimizer question
Date
Msg-id 4016B68F.6090604@diku.dk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Another optimizer question  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruno Wolff III wrote: <blockquote cite="mid20040127174135.GA14806@wolff.to" type="cite"><pre wrap="">On Tue, Jan 27,
2004at 17:27:25 +0100, Dennis Haney <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:davh@diku.dk"><davh@diku.dk></a>wrote: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">Is it just me, or
isthere any way a sort could be relevant in a 
 
subquery? (except on queries containing volatile functions)   </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
Yes. It is important when a limit or distinct on clause is used in a
subquery. </pre></blockquote> Yup, but queries with those are also ignored, so I'm only talking about explicit 'order
by'without any fancy stuff ;)<br /><br /><br /><pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
 
Dennis
</pre>

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Steve Atkins
Date:
Subject: Re: Mixing threaded and non-threaded
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Mixing threaded and non-threaded