Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Date
Msg-id 4014.1130166844@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> We might be able to solve that for plpgsql, but in general we can't, 
> ISTM. What if I write a plperl function that loops forever? We have no 
> chance there to call CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS.

Yeah, I was thinking about that too.  Still, we can/should/already did
fix it in plpgsql.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace
Next
From: yswnhdxi@umail.furryterror.org (Zygo Blaxell)
Date:
Subject: Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY enhancement: Portable signal handling?