Re: sql type reported for enum - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Hudson, Derrick
Subject Re: sql type reported for enum
Date
Msg-id 401084E5E73F4241A44F3C9E6FD79428011BBAC39B@exch-01
Whole thread Raw
In response to sql type reported for enum  (rcohen@e1b.org)
Responses Re: sql type reported for enum
List pgsql-jdbc
There is the following change, which may be related:

    https://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/changelog.html#version_9.2-1003

    Author: Tom Dunstan Date: Sun Jul 7 16:20:41 2013 +0930
    Make PreparedStatement.getObject() for an enum type return a string rather than a PGObject



________________________________________
From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org [pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of rcohen@e1b.org [rcohen@e1b.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 5:21 PM
To: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
Subject: [JDBC] sql type reported for enum

I have some metadata utilities that query jdbc column metadata,
and I'm fairly certain that my enum colums, which used to be reported at
Type.OTHER, are now being reported as Type.VARCHAR.

That is,
        rs.getInt("DATA_TYPE")
returns Type.OTHER

The type names, however, seem to be correct.  Thus,
        rs.getString("TYPE_NAME")
returns the actual enum name.

Not only does my code now behave differently, but I also
see that 3rd party libraries (DBUnit) are also now missing
enum columns.

Thus, DBUnit's PostgresqlDataTypeFactory code for returning enums never
gets hits because the sqlType is never Types.OTHER:

        if (sqlType == Types.OTHER)
            if ("uuid".equals(sqlTypeName))
                return new UuidType();
            else if ("interval".equals(sqlTypeName))
                    return new IntervalType();
            else if ("inet".equals(sqlTypeName))
                return new InetType();
            else
            {
                // Finally check whether the user defined a custom datatype
                if(isEnumType(sqlTypeName))
                {
                    if(logger.isDebugEnabled())
                    return new GenericEnumType(sqlTypeName);
                }
            }


So did something change recently in the drivers?   I've recently upgraded my database from
9.1 to 9.4, along with my jdbc drivers.

Thanks,
Ross


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Albe Laurenz
Date:
Subject: Re: Concurrent read and write access of LargeObject via getBlob() can raise exception
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: sql type reported for enum