Re: Update inside (Insert) Trigger and Unique constraint... - Mailing list pgsql-general

From D. Dante Lorenso
Subject Re: Update inside (Insert) Trigger and Unique constraint...
Date
Msg-id 400EDD39.6090203@lorenso.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Update inside (Insert) Trigger and Unique constraint...  ("D. Dante Lorenso" <dante@lorenso.com>)
Responses Re: Update inside (Insert) Trigger and Unique constraint...
List pgsql-general
NEVERMIND...  This is not a trigger problem.  It's a unique
constraint problem...  If I have a unique constraint on
a column like 'afile_version', and want to do an update on
that column to add one to each number, is there a way to
add an 'ORDER BY' to the update?

    UPDATE audio_file SET
        afile_version = afile_version + 1
    ORDER BY afile_version DESC;

???

The problem is that with

    0 --> 1
    1 --> 2
    2 --> 3
    insert 0

The update would update 0 to 1 and hit a constraint violation.
I needed to start from the bottom and work my way up...

    2 --> 3
    1 --> 2
    0 --> 1
    insert 0

So, I wrote a FOR LOOP like this:

    FOR my_rec IN
        SELECT afile_id
        FROM audio_file
        ORDER BY afile_version DESC
    LOOP
        /* roll back the version... */
        UPDATE audio_file SET
            afile_version = afile_version + 1
        WHERE afile_id = my_rec.afile_id;
    END LOOP;

And that does the trick, but I guess I might also be able
to do something like this?:

    UPDATE audio_file SET
        afile_version = afile_version + 1
    WHERE afile_id IN (
        SELECT afile_id
        FROM audio_file
        ORDER BY afile_version DESC
    );

Yeah, so I guess I figured this out on my own, but from a
performance viewpoint, would the second method be better
... or the first?  Does it matter?

Dante




D. Dante Lorenso wrote:

> I'm trying to build a table that will store a history of records
> by enumerating the records.  I want the newest record to always
> be number ZERO, so I created a trigger on my table to handle the
> assignment of version numbers:
>
>    CREATE TRIGGER "trg_audio_file_insert" BEFORE INSERT
>    ON "public"."audio_file" FOR EACH ROW
>    EXECUTE PROCEDURE "public"."trg_audio_file_insert"();
>
> My trigger function looks like this...
>
>    CREATE FUNCTION "public"."trg_audio_file_insert" () RETURNS trigger
> AS'
>    BEGIN
>       ...
>        /* rollback the version number of previous versions of this
> audio_id */
>        UPDATE audio_file SET
>            afile_version = afile_version + 1
>        WHERE acct_id = NEW.acct_id
>        AND audio_id = NEW.audio_id;
>             /* newly inserted row is always the latest version ''0'' */
>        NEW.afile_version := 0;
>
>       ...
>        /* yeah, that worked */
>        RETURN NEW;
>    END;
>    'LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
>
> There exists a unique constraint on the 'the audio_id / audio_version'
> columns.  However, when I insert records into this table, I'm getting an
> error like:
>
>    duplicate key violates unique constraint "idx_audio_file_id_version"
>    CONTEXT:  PL/pgSQL function "trg_audio_file_insert" line 18 at SQL
> statement
>
> I don't understand WHY there could be a violation of the constraint when
> I clearly asked for the update to be performed prior to the assigning of
> NEW.afile_version := 0;.  Yes, there exist two records with my acct_id
> and
> audio_id with versions 0 and 1 already.  The update should roll them to
> 1 and 2 then the insert at 0 should be unique still.
>
> Why isn't this working?  What's the deal with ordering when it comes to
> triggers?  Is the update not performed when I tell it to?
>
> Dante
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alex Madon
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql + apache under heavy load
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql + apache under heavy load