Re: Old binary packages. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From V i s h a l Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems]
Subject Re: Old binary packages.
Date
Msg-id 400D61CE.5060209@sancharnet.in
Whole thread Raw
In response to Old binary packages.  (Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>)
Responses Re: Old binary packages.  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dear Lamar Owen ,

>Since we are keeping 
>all source releases (although I would question that, since we use CVS), 
>keeping all the binaries around is just a space waster, IMHO.
>
>Comments?
>  
>
Keeping 7.X and then 7.X.y  where y is the last minor version for 7.X is 
fine
As you would have noticed from the [general] list that people are still 
stuck to 7.2  branch
So IMO  keeping 7.2 with  as said (7.X.y) is Okay
but please dont take of 7.3 > till 7.4
Because PostgreSQL is the primary and only source for the distribution 
and if for any reason some one need old version where will  he/she go?



-- 
Regards,
Vishal Kashyap

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
I Know you believe my words so logon to Jabber.org
and add vishalkashyap@jabber.org to your roster.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
I am usually called as Vishal Kashyap
but my Girl friend calls me as Vishal CASH UP.
This is because others know me because of my generosity
and my Girlfriend knows me because of my CASH.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostGIS dropgeometrycolumn function (Was: Re: [7.4] "permissions problem" with pl/pgsql function )
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM delay (was Re: What's planned for 7.5?)