Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Joe Conway wrote:
>>Additionally, this behavior was discussed during the 7.4 development and
>>beta cycles on at least a couple occassions -- that would have been the
>>time to complain, not now.
>
> Well, I will complain whenever I see something I don't like :-)
No issue with that, I just like to encourage more, ahem, timely feedback
whenever possible ;-).
> In the documentation I got the impression that NULL values inside an array
> was not allowed. Now I know that you are allowed to form such an
> expression and that it evaluates to the NULL array. The documentation
> should be fixed then (or maybe it is documented buy i've not seen it).
I agree, and see Tom does too in a nearby post. Do you want to propose
some wording, or just leave it up to me?
Joe
