Run it like a contract. Just describe how you update and maintain the
site and ask that all ideas must be compliant with these practices. The
reward is a 'credit' link.
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Robert Bernier wrote:
>
>
>
>>Actually I was thinking in bigger terms ie: put a new face on the entire
>>website. The person you're originally responding to started out his
>>thread by talking about rebuilding the site. I think that most
>>'ordinary' people have this idea in their head that if a site is good
>>it's because it always changes.
>>
>>Assuming that you are open to the idea it means also that there's a lot
>>of work involved. Why not let other people do it and let them get credit
>>for it? This is what the co-op program is meant to do anyways.
>>
>>
>
>To be honest ... I think there are about a half dozen ppl looking at
>'re-writing' the site now :( the big problem I think that ppl are hitting
>righ tnow is "what technology to use" :) We've had everything from
>OpenACS to Bricolage to straight PHP to ...
>
>Dave, what is the status of Adrian(?)'s work? Everyone should be back
>from holidays now, no?
>
>Josh/Dave/RobertT ... is what RobertB proposing maybe something that could
>be focused on the Advocacy site itself?
>
>
