Re: date comparison between perl and postgres - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From hodges@xprt.net
Subject Re: date comparison between perl and postgres
Date
Msg-id 400116ED.20153.2A0AE43@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to date comparison between perl and postgres  (hodges@xprt.net)
Responses Re: date comparison between perl and postgres
List pgsql-novice
To correct my self - that's month that needs to be padded
with the leading zero.

Tom

On 11 Jan 2004 at 9:18, hodges@xprt.net wrote:

> It seems that perls local::time function returns the day
> of the month as 1-31 whereas postgres returns it as 01-31.
>
> I need to compare dates
>
> if 2004-1-12 (from perl) less than 2004-01-19 (from postgres) and its failing.
>
> Is there a way to have perl return day of the month as
> a 2 digit string or some code to automaticly pad it?
> I am using
>
> # Get current time and date
> ($mday,$mon,$year)=(localtime(time + (24*60*60)))[3..5];
> $mon ++;
> $year +=1900;
> $dstr1 = "$year-$mon-$mday";
>
> Thanks for any ideas,
>
> Tom Hodges
> hodges@xprt.net
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>



pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: hodges@xprt.net
Date:
Subject: date comparison between perl and postgres
Next
From: small.witch@gmx.de
Date:
Subject: Alter TABLE with Postgres 7.2