On 11/18/2016 09:05 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> On November 18, 2016 1:06:18 PM PST, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I think it's important to have the message-ID in cleartext.
> I do ask of that offline or at least locally. So I won't use something that makes that uncomfortable.
>
I agree. My original proposal preserved the Message-ID. I don't think
the hashing proposal would work well.
cheers
andrew
