-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
> Perhaps further clarifying the charters of the various lists would
> help, but folding too much into any one list is likely to reduce the
> number of readers or cause "spotty" attention. (When I was
> attempting to follow all the lists, I'd typically give up when I
> fell about 6000 messages behind, and try to start up again "cold"
> after having missed a big interval of messages.)
I don't quite agree with this, because -general is *already* at the level
where it takes a significant chunk of daily time to keep up with it.
All the other mergeable lists pale in comparison to its volume.
I stopped trying to read lists completely a time ago, and merely read
subject lines at this point, diving into ones that seem interesting
or important.
Merging the smaller lists that have a huge overlap of topics with -general
already would thus be a win, as there would be a larger audience to
reply to, and less lists to administer and have people keep track of.
It would also reduce the confusion of "which list should I post this to?"
I think -admin should absolutely be folded in, -sql really should as well,
and slightly less so -performance and -interfaces.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201004081214
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAku+AV0ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsgVvgCbBh9vsx2cecfAhZQRmju4Vtyi
zz0An0OjXFGtAtOyTUZFDDWGxrRZltBB
=gDQ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
