Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Date
Msg-id 3f8310ef-5677-dd52-235e-655ede43c604@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/18/16 12:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> My feeling is that 82233ce7e has obsoleted all of the proposals made so
> far in this thread, and that we should reject them all.

Yes, it seems that very similar concerns were already addressed there.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take