On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hmm, so after running restore_command, check the file size and if it's
> too short, treat it the same as if restore_command returned non-zero?
Yes, only in standby mode case. OTOH I think that normal archive recovery
should treat it as a FATAL error.
> And it will be retried on the next iteration. Works for me, though OTOH
> it will then fail to complain about a genuinely WAL file that's
> truncated for some reason. I guess there's no way around that, even if
> you have a script as restore_command that does the file size check, it
> will have the same problem.
Right. But the server in standby mode also needs to complain about that?
We might be able to read completely such a WAL file that looks truncated
from the primary via SR, or from the archive after a few seconds. So it's
odd for me to give up continuing the standby only by finding the WAL file
whose file size is short. I believe that the warm standby (+ pg_standby)
also is based on that thought.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
