Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O
Date
Msg-id 3f0b79eb0912092241t77449d0bu52a46d7ad128e0fc@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> The OS buffer is expected to be able to store a large number of
>> XLogRecPtr messages, because its size is small. So it's also OK
>> to just drop it.
>
> It certainly seems to be something we could improve later, when and
> if evidence emerges that it's a real-world problem.  For now,
> simple is beautiful.

I just dropped the backend libpq changes related to non-blocking I/O.
 git://git.postgresql.org/git/users/fujii/postgres.git branch: replication

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] pg_ctl init extension
Next
From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
Subject: Re: bug: fuzzystrmatch levenshtein is wrong