Re: Application name patch - v4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Application name patch - v4
Date
Msg-id 3f0b79eb0911291821x26703cb8w5de80b85354b890a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Application name patch - v4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Application name patch - v4
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
>> Why doesn't application_name appear in postgresql.conf.sample?
>> That is expected to be set from only libpq?
>
> It would seem pretty silly to set it in the conf file.  You *can*,
> if you want, but I see no reason to list it there.

Yeah, I see your point. But, is it a policy not to put such parameter
(other than that for debug) on postgresql.conf.sample?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION