On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Right, those are the possibilities, all four of them have valid use cases in
> the field and are worth implementing. I don't like the label
> "semi-synchronous replication" myself, but it's a valuable feature to
> implement, and that is unfortunately the term other parts of the industry
> use for that approach.
BTW, MySQL and DRBD use the term "semi-synchronous":
http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/ReplicationFeatures/SemiSyncReplication
http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/s-replication-protocols.html
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
