Re: New trigger option of pg_standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
Date
Msg-id 3f0b79eb0903250232y34c06a77jafdc17a45d1e9d1f@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New trigger option of pg_standby  (Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Guillaume Smet
<guillaume.smet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yeah, I agree... but there may be scripts for warm-standby based on
>> the existing default behavior. So, I didn't make a new trigger the default.
>
> I don't use pg_standby personnaly but I admit I'm quite surprised by
> the current behaviour. I'm pretty sure a lot of the current users
> would be surprised too.

The current behavior is documented as follows, so it may be
taken for granted by some users. I think that we shouldn't
ignore such users.

---------------
Specify a trigger file whose presence should cause recovery to
end whether or not the next WAL file is available.
---------------

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuhito Kasahara
Date:
Subject: display previous query string of idle-in-transaction
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Unsupported effective_io_concurrency platforms