On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> And, there are some problems in this patch;
>>
>> * This patch is somewhat big, though it should be subdivided for
>> review.
>>
>> * Source code comments and documents are insufficient.
>>
>> Is it against the rule of commit fest to add such a status patch
>> into review-queue? If so, I would aim for 8.5. Otherwise,
>> I will deal with the problems also during commit fest.
>> What is your opinion?
>
> You can add work-in-progress patches and even just design docs to the
> commitfest queue. That's perfectly OK. They will be reviewed as any other
> work, but naturally if it's not a patch that's ready to be committed without
> major work, it won't be committed.
>
> I haven't looked at the patch yet, but if you think there's chances to get
> it into shape for inclusion to 8.4, before the commit fest is over, you can
> and should keep working on it and submit updated patches during the commit
> fest. However, help with reviewing other patches would also be very much
> appreciated. The idea of commitfests is that everyone stops working on their
> own stuff, except for cleaning up and responding to review comments on one's
> own patches that are in the queue, and helps to review other people's
> patches.
OK, thanks Heikki. I will keep working on Synch Rep during commit-fest.
At first, as you say, I'll split the signal handling changes into an individual
patch ASAP.
Regards;
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
