Re: Number or parameters for functions - limited to 32 ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From imageguy
Subject Re: Number or parameters for functions - limited to 32 ?
Date
Msg-id 3cb4687a-a977-4338-b435-92715418915b@s39g2000prd.googlegroups.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Number or parameters for functions - limited to 32 ?  (imageguy <imageguy1206@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Number or parameters for functions - limited to 32 ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Apr 8, 12:20 pm, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) wrote:
> Richard Huxton <d...@archonet.com> writes:
> > imageguy wrote:
> >> I am attempting to port and application that was designed for MS-SQL
> >> to Postgres and bumped into a limitation of pg functions, namely that
> >> pg functions can only support 32 parameters.
> > I thought it had been increased to 64, but I'm sure you're right.
>
> It was raised to 100 in 8.1.
>
>                         regards, tom lane

Thanks Tom.
- forgive me for asking but where would I find this in the docs ?

Richard - thanks for the tip on the record type


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Amiel
Date:
Subject: Re: More SSL crash woes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Cannot use a standalone backend to VACUUM in "postgres""