Re: Re: [BUGS] Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: Re: [BUGS] Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Date
Msg-id 3c4bdcba-16b4-c6c2-5451-cc913a289387@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 8/22/16 7:36 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> For some reason, both cases involved
> strings with code points from the Arabic alphabet, even though each
> case was from a totally unrelated customer database.

Do those code points read right to left? Maybe that had an effect?
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)   mobile: 512-569-9461



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_receivexlog does not report flush position with --synchronous
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots