Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers
Date
Msg-id 3b678314-054a-6119-b373-4574067f404e@timescale.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers  ("Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/22/22 06:31, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> FWIW, I just created a new thread to expose the port->authn_id through 
> the SYSTEM_USER sql reserved word.

Review for both seems to have dried up a bit. I'm not particularly
invested in my code, but I do want to see *a* solution go in. So if it
helps the review momentum for me to withdraw this patch and put my
effort into SYSTEM_USER, I can do that no problem.

Thoughts from prior reviewers? Is SYSTEM_USER the way to go?

--Jacob



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Add proper planner support for ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints