Re: Windows vs recovery tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Windows vs recovery tests
Date
Msg-id 3b39b80a-475c-7d47-12f8-b63e9b1d8e3f@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Windows vs recovery tests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/12/22 16:15, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> For some considerable time the recovery tests have been at best flaky on
>> Windows, and at worst disastrous (i.e. they can hang rather than just
>> fail).
> How long is "some considerable time"?  I'm wondering if this isn't
> the same issue under discussion in
>
>
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKG%2BOeoETZQ%3DQw5Ub5h3tmwQhBmDA%3DnuNO3KG%3DzWfUypFAw%40mail.gmail.com
>
>             



many months - this isn't a new thing.


I'm going to set up a system where I run the test in a fairly tight loop
and see if I can find out more.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid erroring out when unable to remove or parse logical rewrite files to save checkpoint work
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: A qsort template