Re: RangeTblEntry jumble omissions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: RangeTblEntry jumble omissions
Date
Msg-id 3a26d89e-706b-4281-a1e5-9c01ecaa5d9d@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RangeTblEntry jumble omissions  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 26.02.24 02:08, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 06:52:54PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> - funcordinality
>>>> This was probably just forgotten.  It should be included because the WITH
>>>> ORDINALITY clause changes the query result.
>>
>>> Agreed.
>>
>> Seems OK.
> 
> +1.

Ok, I have added funcordinality for the RTE_FUNCTION case, and left the 
others alone.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: RangeTblEntry.inh vs. RTE_SUBQUERY
Next
From: "Andrey M. Borodin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Injection points: some tools to wait and wake