Re: Introduce pg_receivewal gzip compression tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From gkokolatos@pm.me
Subject Re: Introduce pg_receivewal gzip compression tests
Date
Msg-id 3NaNnzcFOo6mMA50bGVOS7RNlz1IqJ8nBxvMRQw9UZFUu9zSK2taKcmmrI2B0dehIXVskeCtbtA5yTnpkPGBTJvD-55DqTjRR-nji7tML68=@pm.me
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Introduce pg_receivewal gzip compression tests  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Introduce pg_receivewal gzip compression tests  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Tuesday, July 13th, 2021 at 12:26, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 08:28:44AM +0000, gkokolatos@pm.me wrote:
> > Sounds great. Let me cook up v6 for this.
>
> Thanks. Could you use v5 I posted upthread as a base? There were
> some improvements in the variable names, the comments and the test
> descriptions.

Agreed. For the record that is why I said v6 :)

Cheers,
//Georgios

>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ibrar Ahmed
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails
Next
From: Ibrar Ahmed
Date:
Subject: Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)