Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>
>>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>>
>>
>>>The minimal disturbance change might be to teach the parser to
>>>distinguish between a quoted 'all' and an unquoted 'all', and forget the
>>>'*' idea.
>>>
>>>
>>Probably we ought to go with that, on backwards-compatibility grounds.
>>
>>
>
>why not do both, but deprecate the use of all in the docs? say with an
>eventual goal of removing the use of all altogether in 2 releases?
>
>
>
The extra value is fairly low IMNSHO if we can distinguish between a
magical and a non-magical 'all' - see the patch I just submitted.
cheers
andrew